Education for Family Planning Acceptors to Use IUD Contraception at the Cikeusik Pandeglang Community Health Center

Albahra Albahra; Fathiyati Fathiyati; Partono Siswosuharjo

doi:10.37430/jen.v7i1.192

Education for Family Planning Acceptors to Use IUD Contraception at the Cikeusik Pandeglang Community Health Center

Albahra Albahra, Fathiyati Fathiyati, Partono Siswosuharjo

Abstract

This study aims to determine the factors associated with family planning acceptors' reluctance to use IUD contraception. The type of research used is cross sectional research. The sample in this study was 99 respondents. The results of the research obtained that the age value with reluctance to use IUD family planning P Value = 0.17 with a value of ɑ=0.05, parity with a value of P Value = 0.065 with a value of ɑ=0.05, education value P Value = 0.958 with a value of ɑ= 0.05, knowledge value P Value = 0.975 with a value of ɑ=0.05, so Ho is accepted meaning there is no relationship between age, parity, education and knowledge and reluctance to use IUD family planning. Based on the data obtained from the research results, it was found that all of the four variables of age, parity, education and knowledge studied had no relationship to the reluctance to use IUD contraception. Through this research, it is hoped that family planning acceptors will increase their knowledge, especially about IUD contraception, and be more careful and precise in choosing a family planning contraceptive method that is tailored to the acceptor's condition and understand how to use it, the benefits and side effects in increasing a happy and prosperous family

Keywords

Family Planning Acceptors; Age; Parity; Contraception; IUD

Full Text:

PDF

References

Hendricks A Evaluation Framework for Community Engagement Based on the United Nations Brisbane Declaration. Australia: Darzin Sortware, 2009. [Google Scholar]

Fendall N Declaration of Alma-Ata. Lancet. 1978;312(8103):1308 10.1016/S0140-6736(78)92066-4. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Principles of Community Engagement. Atlanta, GA: CDC/ATSDR Committee on Community Engagement, 1997. [Google Scholar]

Gold RB, Hasstedt K. Publicly Funded Family Planning Under Unprecedented Attack. American journal of public health 2017. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Brindis CD, Freund KM, Baecher-Lind L, et al. The risk of remaining silent: addressing the current threats to women’s health. Women’s health issues 2017; 27(6): 621–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

US Department of Health and Human Services. Compliance with Statuatory Program Integrity Requirements Title X. Federal Register 84, 7714–7791; 2019. [Google Scholar]

US Departments of Treasury Labor and Health and Human Services. Religious Exemptions and Accommodations for Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act: Final Rules. Federal Register 82, 47792–47835; 2018. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

US Departments of Treasury Labor and Health and Human Services. Moral Exemptions and Accommodations for Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act: Final Rules. Federal Register 82, 47792–47835; 2018b. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Romano MJ, Grumbach K. Perspectives in Primary Care: Family Medicine in a Divided Nation. Annals of family medicine 2017; 15(1): 4–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Nisen MB, Peterson LE, Cochrane A, Rubin SE. US family physicians’ intrauterine and implantable contraception provision: results from a national survey. Contraception 2016; 93(5): 432–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Harper CC, Henderson JT, Raine TR, et al. Evidence-based IUD practice: family physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists. Family medicine 2021; 44(9): 637. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Harper CC, Stratton L, Raine TR, et al. Counseling and provision of long-acting reversible contraception in the US: national survey of nurse practitioners. Preventive medicine 2013; 57(6): 883–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Bornstein M, Carter M, Zapata L, Gavin L, Moskosky S. Access to long-acting reversible contraception among US publicly funded health centers. Contraception 2018; 97(5): 405–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Jacobson L, Garbers S, Helmy H, Roobol H, Kohn JE, Kavanaugh ML. IUD services among primary care practices in New York City. Contraception 2016; 93(3): 257–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Biggs MA, Kaller S, Harper CC, Freedman L, Mays AR. “Birth Control can Easily Take a Back Seat”: Challenges Providing IUDs in Community Health Care Settings. Journal of health care for the poor and underserved 2018; 29(1): 228–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Biggs MA, Harper CC, Brindis CD. California family planning health care providers’ challenges to same-day long-acting reversible contraception provision. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2015; 126(2): 338–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Stanwood NL, Garrett JM, Konrad TR. Obstetrician-gynecologists and the intrauterine device: a survey of attitudes and practice. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:275–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Harper CC, Blum M, de Bocanegra HT, et al. Challenges in translating evidence to practice: The provision of intrauterine contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:1359–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Harper CC, Henderson JT, Raine TR, et al. Evidence-based IUD practice: family physicians and obstretrician-gynecologists. Fam Med. 2021;44:637–45. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Thompson KMJ, Speidel JJ, Saporta V, Waxman NJ, Harper CC. Contraceptive policies affect post-abortion provision of long-acting reversible contraception. Contraception. 2011;83:41–7. PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Morse J, Freedman L, Speidel JJ, Thompson KMJ, Stratton L, Harper CC. Post-abortion contraception: Qualitative interviews on counseling and provision of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2021;44:100–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Department of reproductive health and research, WHO. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use-Part II using the recommendation. Geneva, Switzerland, 2015. Available at: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/family_planning/MEC-5/en/. Accessed 03/12/2016.

American College of O, Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 121: Long-acting reversible contraception: Implants and intrauterine devices. Obstetrics and gynecology U6 2011;118(1):184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Harper CC, Rocca CH, Thompson KM, et al. Reductions in pregnancy rates in the USA with long-acting reversible contraception: a cluster randomised trial. The Lancet 2015; 386(9993): 562–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Gomez AM, Mann ES, Torres V. ‘It would have control over me instead of me having control’: intrauterine devices and the meaning of reproductive freedom. Critical Public Health 2018; 28(2): 190–200. [Google Scholar]

Yati Isnaini S, Nur Z. (2022), The effect of knowledge and attitude of family planning acceptances on iud contraception selection during the COVID-19 pandemic. Bali Medical Journal (Bali MedJ), Volume 11 (2) 981-984, file:///C:/Users/Lenovo/Downloads/The_effect_of_knowledge_and_attitude_of_family_pla.pdf

Bernadus JD, Sam U, Manado R. FaktorFaktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Pemilihan Alat Kontrasepsi Dalam Rahim (Akdr) Bagi Akseptor Kb Di Puskesmas Jailolo. e-NERS. 2013;1(1):1–10.

Michie L, Cameron ST, Glasier A, Wellings K, Loudon J. Myths and misconceptions about intrauterine contraception among women seeking termination of pregnancy. [2018 Mar 20];J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2014 40(1):36–40. Internet. Available from: http://srh.bmj.com/content/familyplanning/40/1/36.full.pdf. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Hall KS, Ela E, Zochowski MK, Caldwell A, Moniz M, McAndrew L, et al. "I don't know enough to feel comfortable using them:" Women's knowledge of and perceived barriers to long-acting reversible contraceptives on a college campus. [2018 Mar 22];Contraception. 2016 93(6):556–564. Internet. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4853253/ [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Wellings K, Jones KG, Mercer CH, Tanton C, Clifton S, Datta J, et al. The prevalence of unplanned pregnancy and associated factors in Britain: findings from the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3) [2018 Mar 22];Lancet. 2013 382(9907):1807–1816. Internet. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3898922/ [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Johnson, O. and Ekong, I., Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Family Planning among Women in a Rural Community in Southern Nigeria. British Journal of Medicine & Medical Research. 12(2) (2016) 1-8.

Sererci, G.Y., and Yildirim, T.A., The knowledge, Attitude and Behaviours of Syrian Refugee Women towards Family Planning: Sample of Hatay. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 26 (4) (2020) e12844.

Nansseu, J.R., Nchinda, E.C., Katte, J.C., Nchagnouot, F.M. and Nguetsa, G.D., Assessing the knowledge, attitude, and practice of family planning among women living in the Mbouda health district, Cameroon. Reproductive health. 12 (2015) 92.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37430/jen.v7i1.192